Cessna 182 Skylane Safety Record & Buying Guide
Editorial safety summary — see Cessna 182 listings and consult a qualified A&P/inspector for individual aircraft decisions.
The Cessna 182 Skylane shares the 172's safety DNA — same high-wing tricycle-gear fixed-gear design (in fixed-gear variants), same benign stall behaviour, same docile handling — with the addition of a more powerful Continental O-470 or Lycoming IO-540 engine and constant- speed propeller. Modern 182 fatal-accident rates are consistent with the high-wing four-seat class and at or below GA average. The 182RG (retractable-gear variant, 1978-1986) adds the gear- warning system and gear-up landing risk that retractable-gear singles share. The 182 has fewer training-fleet accidents than the 172 simply because it's not a primary trainer; its accident profile skews toward cross-country phases (weather decisions, fuel exhaustion on long legs).
Common safety topics
- Engine management — Continental O-470 / Lycoming IO-540 demand proper leaning and cooling technique; mis-management causes preventable engine wear.
- Retractable-gear variants (182RG) — gear-up landings; pre-landing checklist discipline.
- Weight-and-balance — the 182's larger useful load enables overload; weight-and-balance discipline matters on family/cargo flights.
- VFR-into-IMC — same leading cause as the 172; modern avionics help, training is key.
Pre-buy safety checklist
- Engine logs and overhaul history — O-470 or IO-540 specific to variant.
- Landing gear inspection (RG variants) — actuator, gear-warning function, retraction tests.
- Airframe inspection — common corrosion points, control surface condition.
- ADs and SBs compliance.
- Avionics revision and mandate compliance.
Safety FAQ
- Is the 182 safer than the 172?
- Similar fundamental airframe safety; the 182's pilot population skews more experienced (less training-fleet accidents). Overall accident rates are class-average.
- Are gear-up landings common in the 182RG?
- They remain a fleet issue for all retractable singles; proper pre-landing checklists and a working gear-warning system are essential.
- Continental O-470 reliability?
- Good with proper maintenance; older variants need careful cylinder condition monitoring.
- Is the 182 good for IFR?
- Yes — stable platform, capable of meaningful IFR with proper avionics. Pilot training and currency dominate the safety equation.