Cirrus SR22T vs Cessna 210

The Cessna 210 Centurion (six-seat retractable, ~180-190 kt) competes against multiple six-seat / high-performance singles — Cirrus SR22T (four-seat turbo, ~213 kt, CAPS), Diamond DA62 (seven-seat twin diesel, ~190 kt), Mooney M20J (four-seat efficient, ~160 kt), Piper Malibu (six-seat pressurised, ~213+ kt), Piper Saratoga (six-seat ~150-165 kt).

Full Specs Comparison

Swipe to see all specs
Spec / Model Cirrus SR22T Cessna 210
Cirrus SR22T
View 298 listings →
Median $774,900
Cessna 210
View 172 listings →
Median $250,000
Price Range $210,000 – $1,700,000 $25,000 – $975,000
Category Single Engine Piston Single Engine Piston
Model Specifications
Seats 5 6
Horsepower 315 HP 300 HP
Cruise Speed 213 kts (394 km/h) 164 kts (304 km/h)
Range 1,021 nm (1,891 km) 900 nm (1,667 km)
Service Ceiling 25,000 ft (7,620 m) 17,300 ft (5,273 m)
Max Gross Weight 3,600 lbs (1,633 kg) 3,800 lbs (1,724 kg)
Useful Load 1,098 lbs (498 kg) 1,310 lbs (594 kg)
Fuel Capacity 92.0 gal (348 L) 90.0 gal (341 L)
Fuel Burn 16.0 GPH (61 L/h) 14.5 GPH (55 L/h)
TBO 2,000 hrs 1,500 hrs
Overhaul Cost $40,000 $35,000
Annual Fixed $28,000 $22,000
Hourly Variable $210 $175
Engines 1 x Piston (Turbocharged) 1 x Piston

Cost of Ownership

Estimate

Cirrus SR22T

Fuel$88/hr
Variable$210/hr
Annual Fixed$28,000/yr
Total (200 hrs/yr) $70,000/yr

Cessna 210

Fuel$80/hr
Variable$175/hr
Annual Fixed$22,000/yr
Total (200 hrs/yr) $57,000/yr

Which Should You Buy: Cirrus SR22T or Cessna 210?

Bottom line: Choose the 210 for the iconic high-wing six-seat retractable Cessna — the proven high-performance utility-six-seater. The competitors offer specific advantages (CAPS parachute, diesel economics, efficiency, pressurisation) — choose the 210 when you specifically want the high-wing six-seat Cessna character and the broad Cessna support network. ================================================================ # CESSNA 182 × OTHER (cross-refs — already covered elsewhere) ================================================================

Pick the SR22T if…

  • Faster cruise — 213 kts vs 164 kts.
  • Longer range — 1021 nm vs 900 nm.
  • Newer design — production from 2010 vs 1960.
  • More inventory — 298 listings vs 172.

Pick the 210 if…

  • Budget matters — from $25,000 vs $210,000, you save ~$185,000.
  • Lower operating cost — ~$175/hr vs $210/hr.
  • More seats — 6 vs 5.

Auto-generated from current market data and published specs. Confirm with a pre-buy inspection and professional appraisal.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Cirrus SR22T or Cessna 210?
It depends on your mission and budget. The SR22T cruises at 213 kts with 1,021 nm range. The 210 cruises at 164 kts with 900 nm range. Review the specs table above to find which fits your flying profile.
How do prices compare?
Cirrus SR22T: from $945,000. Cessna 210: from $254,900. Prices vary by year, hours, avionics, and condition. Always get a pre-buy inspection.
What's the difference between Cirrus SR22T and Cessna 210?
SR22T engine: Continental IO-550-N (315 hp). 210 engine: Continental IO-470-E (300 hp). Seats: 5 vs 6. Cruise: 213 vs 164 kts. Range: 1021 vs 900 nm.
Which is cheaper to operate per hour?
SR22T: about $210/hr variable cost. 210: about $175/hr variable cost. Variable cost includes fuel, reserves and overhaul accruals. Annual fixed costs (hangar, insurance, annual inspection) add to the total.
Which has more seats and useful load?
SR22T: 5 seats / 1,098 lb useful load. 210: 6 seats / 1,310 lb useful load. Useful load = max gross weight minus empty weight; it determines how much fuel plus payload you can carry.
How does maintenance compare — TBO and overhaul cost?
SR22T: 2,000-hour TBO, overhaul ~$40,000. 210: 1,500-hour TBO, overhaul ~$35,000. Reaching the time-between-overhaul (TBO) triggers a mandatory engine/airframe rebuild that affects resale value.
Disclaimer: All prices and cost estimates are from third-party sources for informational purposes only. Always obtain professional appraisal and inspection before purchase.
Prices updated daily · Data: FAA Registry, NTSB · About our data