Beechcraft Baron 58 vs Cessna 310F
Live Market Snapshot
Current asking-price market, aggregated across multiple marketplaces · refreshed daily
Beechcraft Baron 58
- For sale now
- 121
- Median asking
- $449,000
- Range
- $189,635–$1,319,400
- Model years available
- 1970–2024
Cessna 310F
- For sale now
- 3
- Model years available
- 1961–1961
Live data from AeroGurus, aggregated daily across the used-aircraft market. Figures are current asking prices, not appraisals — confirm with a pre-buy inspection.
Safety Record
Absolute counts scale with fleet size — the most-produced types log more events without being less safe. Compare the % fatal.
| NTSB (1982–now) | Beechcraft Baron 58 | Cessna 310F |
|---|---|---|
| All events | — | 14 |
| Serious | — | 0 |
| Fatal | — | 5 |
| Fatalities | — | 5 |
| % Fatal | — | 36% |
Full Specs Comparison
Swipe to see all specs
| Spec / Model | Beechcraft Baron 58 | Cessna 310F |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Price Range | $189,635 – $1,319,400 | $115,571 – $130,879 |
| Category | Multi Engine Piston | Multi Engine Piston |
| Model Specifications | ||
| Seats | 6 | 5 |
| Horsepower | 300 HP | 240 HP |
| Cruise Speed | 190 kts (352 km/h) | 185 kts (343 km/h) |
| Range | 1,225 nm (2,269 km) | 800 nm (1,482 km) |
| Service Ceiling | 20,688 ft (6,306 m) | 20,000 ft (6,096 m) |
| Max Gross Weight | 5,500 lbs (2,495 kg) | 4,830 lbs (2,191 kg) |
| Useful Load | 1,846 lbs (837 kg) | 1,700 lbs (771 kg) |
| Fuel Capacity | 166.0 gal (628 L) | 100.0 gal (378 L) |
| Fuel Burn | 28.0 GPH (106 L/h) | 26.0 GPH (98 L/h) |
| TBO | 1,700 hrs | 1,500 hrs |
| Overhaul Cost | $40,000 | $38,000 |
| Annual Fixed | $28,000 | $26,000 |
| Hourly Variable | $310 | $290 |
| Engines | 2 x Piston | 2 x Piston |
Cost of Ownership
EstimateBeechcraft Baron 58
Fuel$154/hr
Variable$310/hr
Annual Fixed$28,000/yr
Total (200 hrs/yr)
$90,000/yr
Cessna 310F
Fuel$143/hr
Variable$290/hr
Annual Fixed$26,000/yr
Total (200 hrs/yr)
$84,000/yr
Which Should You Buy: Beechcraft Baron 58 or Cessna 310F?
Pick the Baron 58 if…
- More seats — 6 vs 5.
- Faster cruise — 190 kts vs 185 kts.
- Longer range — 1225 nm vs 800 nm.
- Newer design — production from 1970 vs 1961.
- More inventory — 74 listings vs 3.
Pick the 310F if…
- Budget matters — from $115,571 vs $189,635, you save ~$74,064.
- Lower operating cost — ~$290/hr vs $310/hr.
Auto-generated from current market data and published specs. Confirm with a pre-buy inspection and professional appraisal.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Beechcraft Baron 58 or Cessna 310F?
It depends on your mission and budget.
The Baron 58 cruises at 190 kts with 1,225 nm range.
The 310F cruises at 185 kts with 800 nm range.
Review the specs table above to find which fits your flying profile.
How do prices compare?
Beechcraft Baron 58: from $599,000.
Cessna 310F: from $113,340.
Prices vary by year, hours, avionics, and condition. Always get a pre-buy inspection.
What's the difference between Beechcraft Baron 58 and Cessna 310F?
310F engine: CONTINENTAL O-470-D (240 hp).
Seats: 6 vs 5.
Cruise: 190 vs 185 kts.
Range: 1225 vs 800 nm.
Which is cheaper to operate per hour?
Baron 58: about $310/hr variable cost.
310F: about $290/hr variable cost.
Variable cost includes fuel, reserves and overhaul accruals. Annual fixed costs (hangar, insurance, annual inspection) add to the total.
Which has more seats and useful load?
Baron 58: 6 seats / 1,846 lb useful load.
310F: 5 seats / 1,700 lb useful load.
Useful load = max gross weight minus empty weight; it determines how much fuel plus payload you can carry.
How does maintenance compare — TBO and overhaul cost?
Baron 58: 1,700-hour TBO, overhaul ~$40,000.
310F: 1,500-hour TBO, overhaul ~$38,000.
Reaching the time-between-overhaul (TBO) triggers a mandatory engine/airframe rebuild that affects resale value.
Disclaimer: All prices and cost estimates are from third-party sources for informational purposes only. Always obtain professional appraisal and inspection before purchase.
Prices updated daily · Data: FAA Registry, NTSB · About our data