Cessna 210 vs Piper Saratoga
The Cessna 210 Centurion and the Piper Saratoga are two six-seat high-performance singles — the high-wing, retractable 210 and the low-wing Saratoga. The 210 offers high-wing visibility and retractable speed; the Saratoga a comfortable low-wing cabin with club seating. Where each trades now is below.
Live Market Snapshot
Current asking-price market, aggregated across multiple marketplaces · refreshed daily
- For sale now
- 177
- Median asking
- $249,750
- Range
- $90,200–$695,000
- Model years available
- 1960–2021
- For sale now
- 170
- Median asking
- $226,400
- Range
- $115,250–$495,525
- Model years available
- 1965–2007
Live data from AeroGurus, aggregated daily across the used-aircraft market. Figures are current asking prices, not appraisals — confirm with a pre-buy inspection.
Generations Breakdown
Per-generation specs — engine/weight/performance differ materially across production eras.
Per-era “For sale” counts exclude listings with unspecified year and separate variants (RG retractable, Hawk XP), so they may not sum to the total above.
Cessna 210 — 4 generations
| Generation | Years | Engine | MTOW | Cruise | Range | For sale |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 210 IO-470 (260hp) | 1960–1963 | IO-470-E | 2900 | 160 | 700 | 29 |
| 210 IO-520 (NA) | 1964–1986 | IO-520-A/L | 3800 | 171 | 900 | 47 |
| T210 Turbo | 1966–1986 | TSIO-520-R | 3800 | 193 | 950 | 58 |
| P210 Pressurized | 1978–1986 | TSIO-520-P | 4000 | 200 | 1000 | 57 |
Piper Saratoga — 0 generations
| Generation | Years | Engine | MTOW | Cruise | Range | For sale |
|---|
Safety Record
Absolute counts scale with fleet size — the most-produced types log more events without being less safe. Compare the % fatal.
| NTSB (1982–now) | Cessna 210 | Piper Saratoga |
|---|---|---|
| All events | 819 | 1 |
| Serious | 64 | 0 |
| Fatal | 192 | 0 |
| Fatalities | 413 | 0 |
| % Fatal | 23% | 0% |
Full Specs Comparison
| Spec / Model | Cessna 210 | Piper Saratoga |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Price Range | $90,200 – $695,000 | $115,250 – $495,525 |
| Category | Single Engine Piston | Single Engine Piston |
| Model Specifications | ||
| Seats | 6 | 6 |
| Horsepower | 260–325 HP | 300 HP |
| Cruise Speed | 160–200 kts (370 km/h) | 163 kts (302 km/h) |
| Range | 700–1,000 nm (1,852 km) | 950 nm (1,759 km) |
| Service Ceiling | 17,300 ft (5,273 m) | 20,000 ft (6,096 m) |
| Max Gross Weight | 2900–4,000 lbs (1,814 kg) | 3,600 lbs (1,633 kg) |
| Useful Load | 1,310 lbs (594 kg) | 1,360 lbs (617 kg) |
| Fuel Capacity | 90.0 gal (341 L) | 102.0 gal (386 L) |
| Fuel Burn | 14.5 GPH (55 L/h) | 15.0 GPH (57 L/h) |
| TBO | 1,700 hrs | 2,000 hrs |
| Overhaul Cost | $35,000 | $32,000 |
| Annual Fixed | $22,000 | $20,000 |
| Hourly Variable | $175 | $170 |
| Engines | 1 x Piston | 1 x Piston |
Cost of Ownership
EstimateCessna 210
Piper Saratoga
Which Should You Buy: Cessna 210 or Piper Saratoga?
Bottom line: Choose the 210 Centurion for speed and visibility — retractable gear, a high cruise, six seats and the high-wing sight picture. Choose the Saratoga for a comfortable low-wing six-seater — a roomy cabin, club seating and easy family loading. On safety both are capable six-seaters; the 210 asks for retractable-gear discipline, while the choice is otherwise wing layout and feel, not safety. Fast high-wing retractable, or comfortable low-wing hauler.
Pick the 210 if…
- Budget matters — from $90,200 vs $115,250, you save ~$25,050.
Pick the Saratoga if…
- Lower operating cost — ~$170/hr vs $175/hr.
- Faster cruise — 163 kts vs 160 kts.
- Longer range — 950 nm vs 700 nm.
- Newer design — production from 1980 vs 1960.
- More inventory — 121 listings vs 28.
Auto-generated from current market data and published specs. Confirm with a pre-buy inspection and professional appraisal.