Cessna 172 vs Cessna 210
The Cessna 172 Skyhawk and the Cessna 210 Centurion bookend Cessna's single-engine high-wing line — the 172 the fixed-gear four-seat trainer, the 210 the retractable six-seat performer — and the choice is simple economy versus speed and capacity. The Skyhawk is the world's most common trainer; the Centurion is the fast, retractable-gear hauler at the top of the line. Where each stands on the market now is below.
Live Market Snapshot
Current asking-price market, aggregated across multiple marketplaces · re-checked on a rolling daily cycle
- For sale now
- 421
- Median asking
- $134,231
- Range
- $61,563–$324,965
- Model years available
- 1956–2026
- For sale now
- 177
- Median asking
- $249,750
- Range
- $90,200–$695,000
- Model years available
- 1960–2021
Live data from AeroGurus, aggregated daily across the used-aircraft market. Figures are current asking prices, not appraisals — confirm with a pre-buy inspection.
Generations Breakdown
Per-generation specs — engine/weight/performance differ materially across production eras.
Per-era “For sale” counts exclude listings with unspecified year and separate variants (RG retractable, Hawk XP), so they may not sum to the total above.
Cessna 172 — 3 generations
| Generation | Years | Engine | MTOW | Cruise | Range | For sale |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 172 Continental | 1956–1967 | O-300 | 2300 | 118 | 520 | 139 |
| 172 O-320 150hp | 1968–1976 | O-320-E2D | 2300 | 120 | 585 | 132 |
| 172 O-320 160hp | 1977–1986 | O-320-H2AD/D2J | 2400 | 122 | 585 | 104 |
Cessna 210 — 4 generations
| Generation | Years | Engine | MTOW | Cruise | Range | For sale |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 210 IO-470 (260hp) | 1960–1963 | IO-470-E | 2900 | 160 | 700 | 30 |
| 210 IO-520 (NA) | 1964–1986 | IO-520-A/L | 3800 | 171 | 900 | 51 |
| T210 Turbo | 1966–1986 | TSIO-520-R | 3800 | 193 | 950 | 58 |
| P210 Pressurized | 1978–1986 | TSIO-520-P | 4000 | 200 | 1000 | 58 |
Safety Record
Absolute counts scale with fleet size — the most-produced types log more events without being less safe. Compare the % fatal.
| NTSB (1982–now) | Cessna 172 | Cessna 210 |
|---|---|---|
| All events | 6810 | 819 |
| Serious | 542 | 64 |
| Fatal | 960 | 192 |
| Fatalities | 1802 | 413 |
| % Fatal | 14% | 23% |
Full Specs Comparison
| Spec / Model | Cessna 172 | Cessna 210 |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Price Range | $61,563 – $324,965 | $90,200 – $695,000 |
| Category | Single Engine Piston | Single Engine Piston |
| Model Specifications | ||
| Seats | 4 | 6 |
| Horsepower | 145–160 HP | 260–325 HP |
| Cruise Speed | 118–122 kts (226 km/h) | 160–200 kts (370 km/h) |
| Range | 520–585 nm (1,083 km) | 700–1,000 nm (1,852 km) |
| Service Ceiling | 14,000 ft (4,267 m) | 17,300 ft (5,273 m) |
| Max Gross Weight | 2300–2,400 lbs (1,089 kg) | 2900–4,000 lbs (1,814 kg) |
| Useful Load | 878 lbs (398 kg) | 1,310 lbs (594 kg) |
| Fuel Capacity | 56.0 gal (212 L) | 90.0 gal (341 L) |
| Fuel Burn | 8.6 GPH (33 L/h) | 14.5 GPH (55 L/h) |
| TBO | 1,400 hrs | 1,700 hrs |
| Overhaul Cost | $30,000 | $35,000 |
| Annual Fixed | $18,000 | $22,000 |
| Hourly Variable | $130 | $175 |
| Engines | 1 x Piston | 1 x Piston |
Cost of Ownership
EstimateCessna 172
Cessna 210
Which Should You Buy: Cessna 172 or Cessna 210?
Bottom line: Choose the 172 Skyhawk for low-cost, forgiving flying — fixed gear, four seats and the easiest support anywhere, perfect for training and lighter trips. Choose the 210 Centurion when you need speed, range and six seats — retractable gear and a big engine make it a genuine cross-country machine, with the cost and complexity that come with it. On safety both are proven high-wing Cessnas; the 210's retractable gear and higher performance ask for more pilot management, while the 172 stays simple — a step in systems, not a safety gap. The Skyhawk is the simple trainer; the Centurion is the fast retractable.
Pick the 172 if…
- Budget matters — from $61,563 vs $90,200, you save ~$28,637.
- Lower operating cost — ~$130/hr vs $175/hr.
- More inventory — 164 listings vs 31.
Pick the 210 if…
- More seats — 6 vs 4.
- Faster cruise — 160 kts vs 118 kts.
- Longer range — 700 nm vs 518 nm.
- Newer design — production from 1960 vs 1956.
Auto-generated from current market data and published specs. Confirm with a pre-buy inspection and professional appraisal.