Cessna 150 vs Cessna 172
Three of the most common Cessnas form a natural ownership path: the Cessna 150, the Cessna 172 Skyhawk and the Cessna 182 Skylane. The 150 is the bargain two-seat trainer, the 172 the four-seat standard, and the 182 the more capable hauler — the cheapest way to start, the easiest to keep, and the one to grow into. What each is going for now is below.
Live Market Snapshot
Current asking-price market, aggregated across multiple marketplaces · refreshed daily
- For sale now
- 136
- Median asking
- $53,250
- Range
- $32,955–$91,808
- Model years available
- 1959–1978
- For sale now
- 421
- Median asking
- $134,231
- Range
- $61,563–$324,965
- Model years available
- 1956–2026
Live data from AeroGurus, aggregated daily across the used-aircraft market. Figures are current asking prices, not appraisals — confirm with a pre-buy inspection.
Generations Breakdown
Per-generation specs — engine/weight/performance differ materially across production eras.
Per-era “For sale” counts exclude listings with unspecified year and separate variants (RG retractable, Hawk XP), so they may not sum to the total above.
Cessna 150 — 1 generations
| Generation | Years | Engine | MTOW | Cruise | Range | For sale |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 172 O-320 150hp | 1968–1976 | O-320-E2D | 2300 | 120 | 585 | 128 |
Cessna 172 — 3 generations
| Generation | Years | Engine | MTOW | Cruise | Range | For sale |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 172 Continental | 1956–1967 | O-300 | 2300 | 118 | 520 | 137 |
| 172 O-320 150hp | 1968–1976 | O-320-E2D | 2300 | 120 | 585 | 128 |
| 172 O-320 160hp | 1977–1986 | O-320-H2AD/D2J | 2400 | 122 | 585 | 103 |
Safety Record
Absolute counts scale with fleet size — the most-produced types log more events without being less safe. Compare the % fatal.
| NTSB (1982–now) | Cessna 150 | Cessna 172 |
|---|---|---|
| All events | 3241 | 6810 |
| Serious | 351 | 542 |
| Fatal | 427 | 960 |
| Fatalities | 611 | 1802 |
| % Fatal | 13% | 14% |
Full Specs Comparison
| Spec / Model | Cessna 150 | Cessna 172 |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Price Range | $32,955 – $91,808 | $61,563 – $324,965 |
| Category | Single Engine Piston | Single Engine Piston |
| Model Specifications | ||
| Seats | 2 | 4 |
| Horsepower | 100 HP | 145–160 HP |
| Cruise Speed | 97 kts (180 km/h) | 118–122 kts (226 km/h) |
| Range | 420 nm (778 km) | 520–585 nm (1,083 km) |
| Service Ceiling | 14,000 ft (4,267 m) | 14,000 ft (4,267 m) |
| Max Gross Weight | 1,600 lbs (726 kg) | 2300–2,400 lbs (1,089 kg) |
| Useful Load | 530 lbs (240 kg) | 878 lbs (398 kg) |
| Fuel Capacity | 26.0 gal (98 L) | 56.0 gal (212 L) |
| Fuel Burn | 6.0 GPH (23 L/h) | 8.6 GPH (33 L/h) |
| TBO | 1,800 hrs | 1,400 hrs |
| Overhaul Cost | $25,000 | $30,000 |
| Annual Fixed | $15,000 | $18,000 |
| Hourly Variable | $100 | $130 |
| Engines | 1 x Piston | 1 x Piston |
Cost of Ownership
EstimateCessna 150
Cessna 172
Which Should You Buy: Cessna 150 or Cessna 172?
Bottom line: Choose the 150 for the lowest-cost entry — a simple two-seater for learning and budget flying. Choose the 172 Skyhawk for the do-everything four-seater — the most-supported airplane in the world and the natural one to keep. Choose the 182 Skylane when four seats need to carry more — extra power and payload for full cabins and bags. On safety all three are exceptionally benign, proven designs; the 182 adds a constant-speed prop to manage — capability, not a safety gap. The 150 starts you off, the 172 does most of it, the 182 hauls the rest.
Pick the 150 if…
- Budget matters — from $32,955 vs $61,563, you save ~$28,608.
- Lower operating cost — ~$100/hr vs $130/hr.
- Newer design — production from 1959 vs 1956.
Pick the 172 if…
- More seats — 4 vs 2.
- Faster cruise — 118 kts vs 97 kts.
- Longer range — 518 nm vs 420 nm.
- More inventory — 163 listings vs 51.
Auto-generated from current market data and published specs. Confirm with a pre-buy inspection and professional appraisal.