Aviat Husky vs Cessna 182 Continental (early)
Generations Breakdown
Per-generation specs — engine/weight/performance differ materially across production eras.
Per-era “For sale” counts exclude listings with unspecified year and separate variants (RG retractable, Hawk XP), so they may not sum to the total above.
Aviat Husky — 0 generations
| Generation | Years | Engine | MTOW | Cruise | Range | For sale |
|---|
Cessna 182 Continental (early) — 4 generations
| Generation | Years | Engine | MTOW | Cruise | Range | For sale |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 182 Continental (early) | 1956–1976 | Continental O-470-L/R | 2650 | 140 | 640 | 208 |
| 182 Continental (late) | 1977–1986 | Continental O-470-U | 3100 | 142 | 700 | 78 |
| T182 Turbo | 1981–now | Lycoming TIO-540-AK1A | 3100 | 158 | 970 | 46 |
| 182 Lycoming | 1997–now | Lycoming IO-540-AB1A5 | 3100 | 145 | 930 | 151 |
Safety Record
Absolute counts scale with fleet size — the most-produced types log more events without being less safe. Compare the % fatal.
| NTSB (1982–now) | Aviat Husky | Cessna 182 Continental (early) |
|---|---|---|
| All events | 7 | — |
| Serious | 1 | — |
| Fatal | 0 | — |
| Fatalities | 0 | — |
| % Fatal | 0% | — |
Full Specs Comparison
Swipe to see all specs
| Spec / Model | Aviat Husky | Cessna 182 Continental (early) |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| Price Range | — | — |
| Category | — | — |
| Model Specifications | ||
| Seats | 2 | 4 |
| Horsepower | 180 HP | 230–235 HP |
| Cruise Speed | 113 kts (209 km/h) | 140–158 kts (293 km/h) |
| Range | 766 nm (1,419 km) | 640–970 nm (1,796 km) |
| Service Ceiling | 20,000 ft (6,096 m) | 18,900 ft (5,761 m) |
| Max Gross Weight | — | 2650–3,100 lbs (1,406 kg) |
| Useful Load | 925 lbs (420 kg) | 1,140 lbs (517 kg) |
| Fuel Burn | 8.0 GPH (30 L/h) | 13.5 GPH (51 L/h) |
| Engines | 1 x Piston | 1 x Piston |
Which Should You Buy: Aviat Husky or Cessna 182 Continental (early)?
Pick the Husky if…
- Longer range — 766 nm vs 640 nm.
Pick the 182 Continental (early) if…
- More seats — 4 vs 2.
- Faster cruise — 140 kts vs 113 kts.
Auto-generated from current market data and published specs. Confirm with a pre-buy inspection and professional appraisal.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Aviat Husky or Cessna 182 Continental (early)?
It depends on your mission and budget.
The Husky cruises at 113 kts with 766 nm range.
The 182 Continental (early) cruises at 140 kts with 640 nm range.
Review the specs table above to find which fits your flying profile.
How do prices compare?
Prices vary by year, hours, avionics, and condition. Always get a pre-buy inspection.
What's the difference between Aviat Husky and Cessna 182 Continental (early)?
182 Continental (early) engine: Continental O-470-L/R (230 hp).
Seats: 2 vs 4.
Cruise: 113 vs 140 kts.
Range: 766 vs 640 nm.
Which is cheaper to operate per hour?
Variable cost includes fuel, reserves and overhaul accruals. Annual fixed costs (hangar, insurance, annual inspection) add to the total.
Which has more seats and useful load?
Husky: 2 seats / 925 lb useful load.
182 Continental (early): 4 seats / 1,140 lb useful load.
Useful load = max gross weight minus empty weight; it determines how much fuel plus payload you can carry.
How does maintenance compare — TBO and overhaul cost?
Reaching the time-between-overhaul (TBO) triggers a mandatory engine/airframe rebuild that affects resale value.
Disclaimer: All prices and cost estimates are from third-party sources for informational purposes only. Always obtain professional appraisal and inspection before purchase.
Prices updated daily · Data: FAA Registry, NTSB · About our data