Cessna 172 vs Piper Tri-Pacer
Live Market Snapshot
Current asking-price market, aggregated across multiple marketplaces · refreshed daily
- For sale now
- 421
- Median asking
- $134,231
- Range
- $61,563–$324,965
- Model years available
- 1956–2026
- For sale now
- 11
- Median asking
- $47,450
- Range
- $19,875–$85,000
- Model years available
- 1950–2019
Live data from AeroGurus, aggregated daily across the used-aircraft market. Figures are current asking prices, not appraisals — confirm with a pre-buy inspection.
Generations Breakdown
Per-generation specs — engine/weight/performance differ materially across production eras.
Per-era “For sale” counts exclude listings with unspecified year and separate variants (RG retractable, Hawk XP), so they may not sum to the total above.
Cessna 172 — 3 generations
| Generation | Years | Engine | MTOW | Cruise | Range | For sale |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 172 Continental | 1956–1967 | O-300 | 2300 | 118 | 520 | 137 |
| 172 O-320 150hp | 1968–1976 | O-320-E2D | 2300 | 120 | 585 | 128 |
| 172 O-320 160hp | 1977–1986 | O-320-H2AD/D2J | 2400 | 122 | 585 | 103 |
Piper Tri-Pacer — 0 generations
| Generation | Years | Engine | MTOW | Cruise | Range | For sale |
|---|
Safety Record
Absolute counts scale with fleet size — the most-produced types log more events without being less safe. Compare the % fatal.
| NTSB (1982–now) | Cessna 172 | Piper Tri-Pacer |
|---|---|---|
| All events | 6810 | — |
| Serious | 542 | — |
| Fatal | 960 | — |
| Fatalities | 1802 | — |
| % Fatal | 14% | — |
Full Specs Comparison
| Spec / Model | Cessna 172 | Piper Tri-Pacer |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Price Range | $61,563 – $324,965 | $19,875 – $85,000 |
| Category | Single Engine Piston | Single Engine Piston |
| Model Specifications | ||
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Horsepower | 145–160 HP | 150 HP |
| Cruise Speed | 118–122 kts (226 km/h) | 115 kts (213 km/h) |
| Range | 520–585 nm (1,083 km) | 500 nm (926 km) |
| Service Ceiling | 14,000 ft (4,267 m) | 16,000 ft (4,877 m) |
| Max Gross Weight | 2300–2,400 lbs (1,089 kg) | — |
| Useful Load | 878 lbs (398 kg) | 850 lbs (386 kg) |
| Fuel Capacity | 56.0 gal (212 L) | — |
| Fuel Burn | 8.6 GPH (33 L/h) | 8.5 GPH (32 L/h) |
| TBO | 1,400 hrs | — |
| Overhaul Cost | $30,000 | — |
| Annual Fixed | $18,000 | — |
| Hourly Variable | $130 | — |
| Engines | 1 x Piston | 1 x Piston |
Cost of Ownership
EstimateCessna 172
Piper Tri-Pacer
Which Should You Buy: Cessna 172 or Piper Tri-Pacer?
Pick the 172 if…
- Faster cruise — 118 kts vs 115 kts.
- Longer range — 518 nm vs 500 nm.
- More inventory — 163 listings vs 14.
Pick the Tri-Pacer if…
- Budget matters — from $19,875 vs $61,563, you save ~$41,688.
Auto-generated from current market data and published specs. Confirm with a pre-buy inspection and professional appraisal.