Pilatus PC-12 vs Piper Cheyenne
The Pilatus PC-12 (single-engine turboprop, ~280 kt, pressurised cabin-class) and Piper Cheyenne (twin-turboprop, ~280 kt, pressurised) are direct cabin-class turboprop competitors — single vs twin.
Full Specs Comparison
| Spec / Model | Pilatus PC-12 | Piper Cheyenne |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Price Range | $3,300,000 – $7,450,000 | $495,000 – $1,514,887 |
| Category | Single Engine Turboprop | Multi Engine Turboprop |
| Model Specifications | ||
| Seats | 10 | 8 |
| Cruise Speed | 260 kts (482 km/h) | 240 kts (444 km/h) |
| Range | 1,803 nm (3,339 km) | 1,400 nm (2,593 km) |
| Service Ceiling | 30,000 ft (9,144 m) | 31,000 ft (9,449 m) |
| Max Gross Weight | 10,450 lbs (4,740 kg) | 9,050 lbs (4,105 kg) |
| Useful Load | 3,610 lbs (1,637 kg) | 2,900 lbs (1,315 kg) |
| Fuel Capacity | 402.0 gal (1522 L) | 365.0 gal (1382 L) |
| Fuel Burn | 60.0 GPH (227 L/h) | 55.0 GPH (208 L/h) |
| TBO | 3,500 hrs | 3,500 hrs |
| Overhaul Cost | $500,000 | $300,000 |
| Annual Fixed | $180,000 | $100,000 |
| Hourly Variable | $900 | $650 |
| Engines | 1 x Turboprop | 2 x Turboprop |
Cost of Ownership
EstimatePilatus PC-12
Piper Cheyenne
Which Should You Buy: Pilatus PC-12 or Piper Cheyenne?
Bottom line: Choose the PC-12 for single-engine economics, modern systems, the unique cargo door and class-leading dispatch reliability. Choose the Cheyenne only when twin-engine redundancy matters more than operating cost — accepting the Cheyenne's out-of-production status and thinner support.
Pick the PC-12 if…
- More seats — 10 vs 8.
- Faster cruise — 260 kts vs 240 kts.
- Longer range — 1803 nm vs 1400 nm.
- Newer design — production from 1994 vs 1974.
Pick the Cheyenne if…
- Budget matters — from $495,000 vs $3,300,000, you save ~$2,805,000.
- Lower operating cost — ~$650/hr vs $900/hr.
- More inventory — 24 listings vs 18.
Auto-generated from current market data and published specs. Confirm with a pre-buy inspection and professional appraisal.