Cessna Citation M2 vs Cirrus Vision SF50
The Cirrus Vision SF50 (Vision Jet) and Cessna Citation M2 are both single-pilot light jets aimed at the owner-operator who wants to fly their own jet — but they arrive at the concept differently. The Vision Jet is a single-engine jet, Cirrus's extension of its composite aircraft philosophy with a Williams FJ33-5A engine, five to seven seats, and the CAPS parachute system adapted for jet-speed deployment. The Citation M2 (Model 525, successor to the CJ1+) is a twin-engine Williams FJ44-1AP-powered jet with four to five seats, better range, and the safety redundancy of two engines. The cross-shop is emerging as the Vision Jet's order book grows and buyers compare it directly to the established light twin-jet category.
Live Market Snapshot
Current asking-price market, aggregated across multiple marketplaces · refreshed daily
- For sale now
- 57
- Model years available
- 2013–2024
- For sale now
- 42
- Median asking
- $2,999,950
- Range
- $1,035,000–$3,599,965
- Model years available
- 2016–2025
Live data from AeroGurus, aggregated daily across the used-aircraft market. Figures are current asking prices, not appraisals — confirm with a pre-buy inspection.
Full Specs Comparison
| Spec / Model | Cessna Citation M2 | Cirrus Vision SF50 |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Price Range | $3,352,500 – $4,297,500 | $1,035,000 – $3,599,965 |
| Category | Light Jet | Very Light Jet |
| Model Specifications | ||
| Seats | 7 | 7 |
| Cruise Speed | 404 kts (748 km/h) | 311 kts (576 km/h) |
| Range | 1,300 nm (2,408 km) | 1,200 nm (2,222 km) |
| Service Ceiling | 41,000 ft (12,497 m) | 31,000 ft (9,449 m) |
| Max Gross Weight | 10,700 lbs (4,854 kg) | 6,040 lbs (2,740 kg) |
| Useful Load | 3,100 lbs (1,406 kg) | 2,180 lbs (989 kg) |
| Fuel Capacity | 386.0 gal (1461 L) | 296.0 gal (1120 L) |
| Fuel Burn | 115.0 GPH (435 L/h) | 50.0 GPH (189 L/h) |
| TBO | 3,500 hrs | 4,000 hrs |
| Overhaul Cost | $250,000 | $250,000 |
| Annual Fixed | $250,000 | $200,000 |
| Hourly Variable | $1,600 | $950 |
| Engines | 2 x Turbofan | 1 x Turbofan |
Cost of Ownership
EstimateCessna Citation M2
Cirrus Vision SF50
Which Should You Buy: Cessna Citation M2 or Cirrus Vision SF50?
Bottom line: Choose the Vision SF50 for the unique proposition it offers: CAPS emergency parachute protection at jet speed, a single-engine operating cost that's meaningfully lower than the M2, and Cirrus's proven ownership support infrastructure. For a pilot who values the ultimate backup system and is transitioning from a Cirrus SR22, the Vision Jet's familiarity of design ethos is real. Choose the Citation M2 for conventional twin-engine redundancy — two engines mean that a single-engine failure in IMC at altitude is a manageable emergency rather than a CAPS deployment scenario. The M2's longer range (~1,550 nm vs Vision Jet's ~1,200 nm) also opens more mission profiles. Safety axis: the safety argument here is a philosophical question about architecture. The Vision Jet's CAPS offers a different failure-mode protection than the M2's engine redundancy — CAPS protects against scenarios where both engines fail and structural issues; twin redundancy protects specifically against single-engine failure. Both are legitimate safety technologies; they cover different parts of the risk envelope.
Pick the Citation M2 if…
- Faster cruise — 404 kts vs 311 kts.
- Longer range — 1300 nm vs 1200 nm.
- More inventory — 55 listings vs 53.
Pick the Vision SF50 if…
- Budget matters — from $1,035,000 vs $3,352,500, you save ~$2,317,500.
- Lower operating cost — ~$950/hr vs $1600/hr.
- Newer design — production from 2016 vs 2013.
Auto-generated from current market data and published specs. Confirm with a pre-buy inspection and professional appraisal.