Cessna 310L vs Piper Twin Comanche
Live Market Snapshot
Current asking-price market, aggregated across multiple marketplaces · refreshed daily
Cessna 310L
- For sale now
- 4
- Listed on 2+ marketplaces
- 3
- Source marketplaces
- 3
- Model years available
- 1966–1967
Piper Twin Comanche
- For sale now
- 23
- Median asking
- $143,000
- Range
- $105,000–$210,000
- Listed on 2+ marketplaces
- 2
- Source marketplaces
- 5
- Model years available
- 1964–1973
Live data from AeroGurus, aggregated daily across the used-aircraft market. Figures are current asking prices, not appraisals — confirm with a pre-buy inspection.
Safety Record
Absolute counts scale with fleet size — the most-produced types log more events without being less safe. Compare the % fatal.
| NTSB (1982–now) | Cessna 310L | Piper Twin Comanche |
|---|---|---|
| All events | 28 | — |
| Serious | 2 | — |
| Fatal | 5 | — |
| Fatalities | 7 | — |
| % Fatal | 18% | — |
Full Specs Comparison
Swipe to see all specs
| Spec / Model | Cessna 310L | Piper Twin Comanche |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Price Range | $133,475 – $184,925 | $105,000 – $210,000 |
| Category | Multi Engine Piston | Multi Engine Piston |
| Model Specifications | ||
| Seats | 6 | 4 |
| Horsepower | 260 HP | — |
| Cruise Speed | 193 kts (357 km/h) | 155 kts (287 km/h) |
| Range | 800 nm (1,482 km) | 1,000 nm (1,852 km) |
| Max Gross Weight | 5,200 lbs (2,359 kg) | 3,725 lbs (1,690 kg) |
| Useful Load | 1,700 lbs (771 kg) | — |
| Fuel Burn | 24.0 GPH (91 L/h) | — |
| TBO | 1,500 hrs | — |
| Overhaul Cost | $32,000 | — |
| Annual Fixed | $28,000 | — |
| Hourly Variable | $300 | — |
| Engines | 2 x Reciprocating | — |
Cost of Ownership
EstimateCessna 310L
Fuel$132/hr
Variable$300/hr
Annual Fixed$28,000/yr
Total (200 hrs/yr)
$88,000/yr
Piper Twin Comanche
Which Should You Buy: Cessna 310L or Piper Twin Comanche?
Pick the 310L if…
- More seats — 6 vs 4.
- Faster cruise — 193 kts vs 155 kts.
Pick the Twin Comanche if…
- Budget matters — from $105,000 vs $133,475, you save ~$28,475.
- Longer range — 1000 nm vs 800 nm.
- More inventory — 26 listings vs 4.
Auto-generated from current market data and published specs. Confirm with a pre-buy inspection and professional appraisal.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Cessna 310L or Piper Twin Comanche?
It depends on your mission and budget.
The 310L cruises at 193 kts with 800 nm range.
The Twin Comanche cruises at 155 kts with 1,000 nm range.
Review the specs table above to find which fits your flying profile.
How do prices compare?
Cessna 310L: from $189,500.
Piper Twin Comanche: from $130,000.
Prices vary by year, hours, avionics, and condition. Always get a pre-buy inspection.
What's the difference between Cessna 310L and Piper Twin Comanche?
310L engine: Continental O-470-V;O-470-VU (260 hp).
Seats: 6 vs 4.
Cruise: 193 vs 155 kts.
Range: 800 vs 1000 nm.
Which is cheaper to operate per hour?
310L: about $300/hr variable cost.
Variable cost includes fuel, reserves and overhaul accruals. Annual fixed costs (hangar, insurance, annual inspection) add to the total.
Which has more seats and useful load?
310L: 6 seats / 1,700 lb useful load.
Twin Comanche: 4 seats.
Useful load = max gross weight minus empty weight; it determines how much fuel plus payload you can carry.
How does maintenance compare — TBO and overhaul cost?
310L: 1,500-hour TBO, overhaul ~$32,000.
Reaching the time-between-overhaul (TBO) triggers a mandatory engine/airframe rebuild that affects resale value.
Disclaimer: All prices and cost estimates are from third-party sources for informational purposes only. Always obtain professional appraisal and inspection before purchase.
Prices updated daily · Data: FAA Registry, NTSB · About our data