Cessna 310 vs Beechcraft Baron 58
The Baron 58 (high-end six-seat piston twin, ~200 kt) and Cessna 310 (six-seat piston twin, ~195 kt) are direct piston-twin competitors — both Continental IO-520/550 powered, both classic 1960s-2000s twins. The Baron is the refined Beechcraft; the 310 is the workhorse Cessna.
Live Market Snapshot
Current asking-price market, aggregated across multiple marketplaces · refreshed daily
No active listings right now.
- For sale now
- 121
- Median asking
- $449,000
- Range
- $189,635–$1,319,400
- Listed on 2+ marketplaces
- 40
- Source marketplaces
- 11
- Model years available
- 1970–2024
Live data from AeroGurus, aggregated daily across the used-aircraft market. Figures are current asking prices, not appraisals — confirm with a pre-buy inspection.
Safety Record
Absolute counts scale with fleet size — the most-produced types log more events without being less safe. Compare the % fatal.
| NTSB (1982–now) | Cessna 310 | Beechcraft Baron 58 |
|---|---|---|
| All events | 584 | — |
| Serious | 42 | — |
| Fatal | 181 | — |
| Fatalities | 354 | — |
| % Fatal | 31% | — |
Full Specs Comparison
| Spec / Model | Cessna 310 | Beechcraft Baron 58 |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| Price Range | $19,000 – $270,000 | $189,635 – $1,319,400 |
| Category | — | Multi Engine Piston |
| Model Specifications | ||
| Seats | 5 | 6 |
| Horsepower | 240 HP | — |
| Cruise Speed | 190 kts (352 km/h) | 190 kts (352 km/h) |
| Range | 800 nm (1,482 km) | 1,225 nm (2,269 km) |
| Service Ceiling | — | 20,688 ft (6,306 m) |
| Max Gross Weight | 4,830 lbs (2,191 kg) | 5,500 lbs (2,495 kg) |
| Useful Load | 1,700 lbs (771 kg) | 1,846 lbs (837 kg) |
| Fuel Capacity | — | 166.0 gal (628 L) |
| Fuel Burn | 22.0 GPH (83 L/h) | 28.0 GPH (106 L/h) |
| TBO | 1,500 hrs | 1,700 hrs |
| Overhaul Cost | $38,000 | $40,000 |
| Annual Fixed | $25,000 | $28,000 |
| Hourly Variable | $280 | $310 |
| Engines | 2 x Reciprocating | 2 x Piston |
Cost of Ownership
EstimateCessna 310
Beechcraft Baron 58
Which Should You Buy: Cessna 310 or Beechcraft Baron 58?
Bottom line: Choose the Baron 58 for refined Beechcraft cabin, stronger residual values and the still-young modern fleet (production ran until 2023). Choose the 310 for typically lower acquisition cost and the broader Cessna support network — accepting older systems and out-of-production status.
Pick the 310 if…
- Budget matters — from $19,000 vs $189,635, you save ~$170,635.
- Lower operating cost — ~$280/hr vs $310/hr.
Pick the Baron 58 if…
- More seats — 6 vs 5.
- Longer range — 1225 nm vs 800 nm.
- Newer design — production from 1970 vs 1956.
- More inventory — 122 listings vs 48.
Auto-generated from current market data and published specs. Confirm with a pre-buy inspection and professional appraisal.