Cessna 150 vs Cessna 182
The Cessna 150 trained more pilots than nearly any other aircraft of its era — a two-seat, fixed-gear, O-200-powered ramp staple that made flying accessible and affordable from the 1950s onward. The Cessna 182 Skylane is four seats, 230 horsepower, and enough useful load to carry the whole family with luggage. The cross-shop isn't about competing in the same market — it's about the upgrade moment: the pilot who earned a certificate in a 150, now wondering whether the 182 is the right next chapter.
Live Market Snapshot
Current asking-price market, aggregated across multiple marketplaces · refreshed daily
- For sale now
- 136
- Median asking
- $53,250
- Range
- $32,955–$91,808
- Model years available
- 1959–1978
- For sale now
- 489
- Median asking
- $218,897
- Range
- $104,725–$564,768
- Model years available
- 1956–2026
Live data from AeroGurus, aggregated daily across the used-aircraft market. Figures are current asking prices, not appraisals — confirm with a pre-buy inspection.
Generations Breakdown
Per-generation specs — engine/weight/performance differ materially across production eras.
Per-era “For sale” counts exclude listings with unspecified year and separate variants (RG retractable, Hawk XP), so they may not sum to the total above.
Cessna 150 — 1 generations
| Generation | Years | Engine | MTOW | Cruise | Range | For sale |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 172 O-320 150hp | 1968–1976 | O-320-E2D | 2300 | 120 | 585 | 128 |
Cessna 182 — 4 generations
| Generation | Years | Engine | MTOW | Cruise | Range | For sale |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 182 Continental (early) | 1956–1976 | O-470-L/R | 2650 | 140 | 640 | 216 |
| 182 Continental (late) | 1977–1986 | O-470-U | 3100 | 142 | 700 | 86 |
| T182 Turbo | 1981–1986 | TIO-540-AK1A | 3100 | 158 | 970 | 50 |
| 182 Lycoming | 1997–now | IO-540-AB1A5 | 3100 | 145 | 930 | 165 |
Safety Record
Absolute counts scale with fleet size — the most-produced types log more events without being less safe. Compare the % fatal.
| NTSB (1982–now) | Cessna 150 | Cessna 182 |
|---|---|---|
| All events | 3241 | 2779 |
| Serious | 351 | 249 |
| Fatal | 427 | 529 |
| Fatalities | 611 | 1000 |
| % Fatal | 13% | 19% |
Full Specs Comparison
| Spec / Model | Cessna 150 | Cessna 182 |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Price Range | $32,955 – $91,808 | $104,725 – $564,768 |
| Category | Single Engine Piston | Single Engine Piston |
| Model Specifications | ||
| Seats | 2 | 4 |
| Horsepower | 100 HP | 230–235 HP |
| Cruise Speed | 97 kts (180 km/h) | 140–158 kts (293 km/h) |
| Range | 420 nm (778 km) | 640–970 nm (1,796 km) |
| Service Ceiling | 14,000 ft (4,267 m) | 18,100 ft (5,517 m) |
| Max Gross Weight | 1,600 lbs (726 kg) | 2650–3,100 lbs (1,406 kg) |
| Useful Load | 530 lbs (240 kg) | 1,110 lbs (503 kg) |
| Fuel Capacity | 26.0 gal (98 L) | 92.0 gal (348 L) |
| Fuel Burn | 6.0 GPH (23 L/h) | 12.5 GPH (47 L/h) |
| TBO | 1,800 hrs | 1,700 hrs |
| Overhaul Cost | $25,000 | $32,000 |
| Annual Fixed | $15,000 | $20,000 |
| Hourly Variable | $100 | $160 |
| Engines | 1 x Piston | 1 x Piston |
Cost of Ownership
EstimateCessna 150
Cessna 182
Which Should You Buy: Cessna 150 or Cessna 182?
Bottom line: Stay with the 150 if you're building hours solo or with one passenger, operating on a training budget, or looking for the lowest possible cost of entry into the piston-single world. Avgas at roughly 6–7 gph is hard to beat. Move to the 182 when you need four seats, meaningful useful load (roughly 870 lb in a typical 182T), and an IFR-capable platform for real cross-country work. The payload difference alone closes the debate for most family pilots: the 150 cannot carry two adults and baggage without hitting max gross weight, while the 182 routinely does. Safety axis: both are docile, fixed-gear aircraft with excellent safety records. The 182's greater power means faster takeoffs and better climb in density-altitude situations — a meaningful edge in summer heat or high-elevation airports where the 150's 100 hp can leave you short of runway.
Pick the 150 if…
- Budget matters — from $32,955 vs $104,725, you save ~$71,770.
- Lower operating cost — ~$100/hr vs $160/hr.
- Newer design — production from 1959 vs 1956.
Pick the 182 if…
- More seats — 4 vs 2.
- Faster cruise — 140 kts vs 97 kts.
- Longer range — 640 nm vs 420 nm.
- More inventory — 106 listings vs 51.
Auto-generated from current market data and published specs. Confirm with a pre-buy inspection and professional appraisal.