Cessna 162 vs Cessna 172
The Cessna 162 Skycatcher and the Cessna 172 Skyhawk are two very different Cessna trainers — the light-sport two-seat Skycatcher and the four-seat Skyhawk standard. The 162 is a simple LSA flyable on a sport pilot certificate; the 172 is the full four-seat trainer and the most-produced aircraft ever. Where each trades now is below.
Live Market Snapshot
Current asking-price market, aggregated across multiple marketplaces · re-checked on a rolling daily cycle
- For sale now
- 4
- Model years available
- 2011–2011
- For sale now
- 421
- Median asking
- $134,231
- Range
- $61,563–$324,965
- Model years available
- 1956–2026
Live data from AeroGurus, aggregated daily across the used-aircraft market. Figures are current asking prices, not appraisals — confirm with a pre-buy inspection.
Generations Breakdown
Per-generation specs — engine/weight/performance differ materially across production eras.
Per-era “For sale” counts exclude listings with unspecified year and separate variants (RG retractable, Hawk XP), so they may not sum to the total above.
Cessna 162 — 0 generations
| Generation | Years | Engine | MTOW | Cruise | Range | For sale |
|---|
Cessna 172 — 3 generations
| Generation | Years | Engine | MTOW | Cruise | Range | For sale |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 172 Continental | 1956–1967 | O-300 | 2300 | 118 | 520 | 136 |
| 172 O-320 150hp | 1968–1976 | O-320-E2D | 2300 | 120 | 585 | 131 |
| 172 O-320 160hp | 1977–1986 | O-320-H2AD/D2J | 2400 | 122 | 585 | 103 |
Safety Record
Absolute counts scale with fleet size — the most-produced types log more events without being less safe. Compare the % fatal.
| NTSB (1982–now) | Cessna 162 | Cessna 172 |
|---|---|---|
| All events | 8 | 6810 |
| Serious | 3 | 542 |
| Fatal | 0 | 960 |
| Fatalities | 0 | 1802 |
| % Fatal | 0% | 14% |
Full Specs Comparison
| Spec / Model | Cessna 162 | Cessna 172 |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Price Range | $65,004 – $90,350 | $61,563 – $324,965 |
| Category | Single Engine Piston | Single Engine Piston |
| Model Specifications | ||
| Seats | 2 | 4 |
| Horsepower | 100 HP | 145–160 HP |
| Cruise Speed | 100 kts (185 km/h) | 118–122 kts (226 km/h) |
| Range | 470 nm (870 km) | 520–585 nm (1,083 km) |
| Service Ceiling | 14,000 ft (4,267 m) | 14,000 ft (4,267 m) |
| Max Gross Weight | 1,320 lbs (599 kg) | 2300–2,400 lbs (1,089 kg) |
| Useful Load | 470 lbs (213 kg) | 878 lbs (398 kg) |
| Fuel Capacity | 24.0 gal (91 L) | 56.0 gal (212 L) |
| Fuel Burn | 5.5 GPH (21 L/h) | 8.6 GPH (33 L/h) |
| TBO | 2,000 hrs | 1,400 hrs |
| Overhaul Cost | $18,000 | $30,000 |
| Annual Fixed | $9,000 | $18,000 |
| Hourly Variable | $80 | $130 |
| Engines | 1 x Piston | 1 x Piston |
Cost of Ownership
EstimateCessna 162
Cessna 172
Which Should You Buy: Cessna 162 or Cessna 172?
Bottom line: Choose the 162 Skycatcher for the most economical, sport-pilot-friendly entry — a simple light-sport two-seater with low costs, flyable on a sport pilot certificate. Choose the 172 Skyhawk for the do-everything four-seater — more seats, range and capability, the full trainer with unmatched support. On safety both are benign, easy-handling Cessnas; the difference is category and capability, not safety. Sport-pilot LSA entry, or the four-seat standard.
Pick the 162 if…
- Lower operating cost — ~$80/hr vs $130/hr.
- Newer design — production from 2009 vs 1956.
Pick the 172 if…
- Budget matters — from $61,563 vs $65,004, you save ~$3,441.
- More seats — 4 vs 2.
- Faster cruise — 118 kts vs 100 kts.
- Longer range — 518 nm vs 470 nm.
- More inventory — 162 listings vs 5.
Auto-generated from current market data and published specs. Confirm with a pre-buy inspection and professional appraisal.