Cessna 152 vs Piper Tomahawk vs Diamond DA20 Katana
Full Specs Comparison
Swipe to see all specs
| Spec / Model | Cessna 152 | Piper Tomahawk | Diamond DA20 Katana |
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| Price Range | $38,000 – $125,000 | $33,782 – $69,894 | $66,399 – $418,430 |
| Category | Single Engine Piston | Single Engine Piston | Single Engine Piston |
| Model Specifications | |||
| Seats | 2 | — | — |
| Horsepower | 110 HP | — | — |
| Cruise Speed | 100 kts (185 km/h) | — | — |
| Range | 415 nm (769 km) | — | — |
| Service Ceiling | 14,700 ft (4,481 m) | — | — |
| Max Gross Weight | 1,670 lbs (758 kg) | — | — |
| Useful Load | 528 lbs (240 kg) | — | — |
| Fuel Capacity | 26.0 gal (98 L) | — | — |
| Fuel Burn | 6.1 GPH (23 L/h) | — | — |
| TBO | 2,400 hrs | — | — |
| Overhaul Cost | $22,000 | — | — |
| Annual Fixed | $15,000 | — | — |
| Hourly Variable | $100 | — | — |
| Engines | 1 x Piston | — | — |
Cost of Ownership
EstimateCessna 152
Fuel$34/hr
Variable$100/hr
Annual Fixed$15,000/yr
Total (200 hrs/yr)
$35,000/yr
Piper Tomahawk
Diamond DA20 Katana
Which Should You Buy?
Pick the 152 if…
- Most listings for sale — 57
Pick the Tomahawk if…
- Lowest entry price — from $33,782
Pick the DA20 Katana if…
The balanced middle choice — no single category standout, but competitive on price, capability and running costs.
Auto-generated from current market data and published specs. Confirm with a pre-buy inspection and professional appraisal.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Cessna 152, Piper Tomahawk or Diamond DA20 Katana?
It depends on your mission and budget.
The 152 cruises at 100 kts with 415 nm range.
Review the specs table above to find which fits your flying profile.
How do prices compare?
Cessna 152: from $74,950.
Prices vary by year, hours, avionics, and condition. Always get a pre-buy inspection.
Disclaimer: All prices and cost estimates are from third-party sources for informational purposes only. Always obtain professional appraisal and inspection before purchase.
Prices updated daily · Data: FAA Registry, NTSB · About our data