Cessna 150 vs Cessna 152
The Cessna 150 and Cessna 152 are the two-seat trainers that taught much of the world to fly — and c150 vs c152 is one of the most common first-airplane searches there is. Both are simple, economical two-seaters with the same easy high-wing handling; the 152 is the later, slightly more capable version, with a bit more power and useful load. The 150 is the cheapest way into ownership; the 152 is the modest upgrade. Current prices and how many are listed are below.
Live Market Snapshot
Current asking-price market, aggregated across multiple marketplaces · refreshed daily
- For sale now
- 136
- Median asking
- $53,250
- Range
- $32,955–$91,808
- Model years available
- 1959–1978
- For sale now
- 59
- Median asking
- $70,000
- Range
- $45,545–$117,000
- Model years available
- 1977–1983
Live data from AeroGurus, aggregated daily across the used-aircraft market. Figures are current asking prices, not appraisals — confirm with a pre-buy inspection.
Generations Breakdown
Per-generation specs — engine/weight/performance differ materially across production eras.
Per-era “For sale” counts exclude listings with unspecified year and separate variants (RG retractable, Hawk XP), so they may not sum to the total above.
Cessna 150 — 1 generations
| Generation | Years | Engine | MTOW | Cruise | Range | For sale |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 172 O-320 150hp | 1968–1976 | O-320-E2D | 2300 | 120 | 585 | 128 |
Cessna 152 — 0 generations
| Generation | Years | Engine | MTOW | Cruise | Range | For sale |
|---|
Safety Record
Absolute counts scale with fleet size — the most-produced types log more events without being less safe. Compare the % fatal.
| NTSB (1982–now) | Cessna 150 | Cessna 152 |
|---|---|---|
| All events | 3241 | 2435 |
| Serious | 351 | 130 |
| Fatal | 427 | 255 |
| Fatalities | 611 | 386 |
| % Fatal | 13% | 10% |
Full Specs Comparison
| Spec / Model | Cessna 150 | Cessna 152 |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Price Range | $32,955 – $91,808 | $45,545 – $117,000 |
| Category | Single Engine Piston | Single Engine Piston |
| Model Specifications | ||
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Horsepower | 100 HP | 110 HP |
| Cruise Speed | 97 kts (180 km/h) | 100 kts (185 km/h) |
| Range | 420 nm (778 km) | 415 nm (769 km) |
| Service Ceiling | 14,000 ft (4,267 m) | 14,700 ft (4,481 m) |
| Max Gross Weight | 1,600 lbs (726 kg) | 1,670 lbs (758 kg) |
| Useful Load | 530 lbs (240 kg) | 528 lbs (240 kg) |
| Fuel Capacity | 26.0 gal (98 L) | 26.0 gal (98 L) |
| Fuel Burn | 6.0 GPH (23 L/h) | 6.1 GPH (23 L/h) |
| TBO | 1,800 hrs | 2,400 hrs |
| Overhaul Cost | $25,000 | $22,000 |
| Annual Fixed | $15,000 | $15,000 |
| Hourly Variable | $100 | $100 |
| Engines | 1 x Piston | 1 x Piston |
Cost of Ownership
EstimateCessna 150
Cessna 152
Which Should You Buy: Cessna 150 or Cessna 152?
Bottom line: Choose the 150 for the lowest-cost route into flying — a forgiving two-seat trainer that's cheap to buy and run, ideal for learning, building hours and short local flights. Choose the 152 for a little more capability — a stronger engine and slightly higher useful load make it a touch more flexible, for not much more money. On safety both are among the most benign, well-documented trainers ever built; the difference is a small step in capability, not safety. The 150 is the more affordable option; the 152 is the gentle upgrade.
Pick the 150 if…
- Budget matters — from $32,955 vs $45,545, you save ~$12,590.
- Longer range — 420 nm vs 415 nm.
Pick the 152 if…
- Faster cruise — 100 kts vs 97 kts.
- Newer design — production from 1977 vs 1959.
- More inventory — 60 listings vs 51.
Auto-generated from current market data and published specs. Confirm with a pre-buy inspection and professional appraisal.