Bombardier Challenger 300 vs Dassault Falcon 2000
The Dassault Falcon 2000 (large-cabin mid) and Challenger 300 (super-midsize) are direct cabin-class competitors — the Falcon has the larger cross-section and longer range in tri-jet/twin form; the Challenger 300 has the higher cruise speed and modern simple systems.
Full Specs Comparison
Swipe to see all specs
| Spec / Model | Bombardier Challenger 300 | Dassault Falcon 2000 |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Price Range | $4,150,000 – $14,295,000 | $4,650,000 – $13,900,000 |
| Category | Super-Midsize Jet | Large Cabin Jet |
| Model Specifications | ||
| Seats | 10 | 12 |
| Cruise Speed | 450 kts (833 km/h) | 459 kts (850 km/h) |
| Range | 3,100 nm (5,741 km) | 4,000 nm (7,408 km) |
| Service Ceiling | 45,000 ft (13,716 m) | 47,000 ft (14,326 m) |
| Max Gross Weight | 38,850 lbs (17,622 kg) | 42,800 lbs (19,414 kg) |
| Useful Load | 9,500 lbs (4,309 kg) | 12,000 lbs (5,443 kg) |
| Fuel Capacity | 1,430.0 gal (5413 L) | 2,530.0 gal (9576 L) |
| Fuel Burn | 260.0 GPH (984 L/h) | 280.0 GPH (1060 L/h) |
| TBO | 5,000 hrs | 5,000 hrs |
| Overhaul Cost | $700,000 | $800,000 |
| Annual Fixed | $500,000 | $500,000 |
| Hourly Variable | $3,500 | $3,800 |
| Engines | 2 x Turbofan | 2 x Turbofan |
Cost of Ownership
EstimateBombardier Challenger 300
Fuel$1,430/hr
Variable$3,500/hr
Annual Fixed$500,000/yr
Total (200 hrs/yr)
$1,200,000/yr
Dassault Falcon 2000
Fuel$1,540/hr
Variable$3,800/hr
Annual Fixed$500,000/yr
Total (200 hrs/yr)
$1,260,000/yr
Which Should You Buy: Bombardier Challenger 300 or Dassault Falcon 2000?
Bottom line: Choose the Falcon 2000 for the Dassault cabin and lower-fuel-burn design. Choose the Challenger 300 for higher cruise speed, the largest support fleet in the class and class-leading dispatch reliability.
Pick the Challenger 300 if…
- Budget matters — from $4,150,000 vs $4,650,000, you save ~$500,000.
- Lower operating cost — ~$3500/hr vs $3800/hr.
- Newer design — production from 2004 vs 1995.
- More inventory — 53 listings vs 40.
Pick the Falcon 2000 if…
- More seats — 12 vs 10.
- Faster cruise — 459 kts vs 450 kts.
- Longer range — 4000 nm vs 3100 nm.
Auto-generated from current market data and published specs. Confirm with a pre-buy inspection and professional appraisal.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Bombardier Challenger 300 or Dassault Falcon 2000?
It depends on your mission and budget.
The Challenger 300 cruises at 450 kts with 3,100 nm range.
The Falcon 2000 cruises at 459 kts with 4,000 nm range.
Review the specs table above to find which fits your flying profile.
How do prices compare?
Prices vary by year, hours, avionics, and condition. Always get a pre-buy inspection.
What's the difference between Bombardier Challenger 300 and Dassault Falcon 2000?
Challenger 300 engine: Honeywell HTF7000.
Falcon 2000 engine: Pratt & Whitney Canada PW308C.
Seats: 10 vs 12.
Cruise: 450 vs 459 kts.
Range: 3100 vs 4000 nm.
Which is cheaper to operate per hour?
Challenger 300: about $3500/hr variable cost.
Falcon 2000: about $3800/hr variable cost.
Variable cost includes fuel, reserves and overhaul accruals. Annual fixed costs (hangar, insurance, annual inspection) add to the total.
Which has more seats and useful load?
Challenger 300: 10 seats / 9,500 lb useful load.
Falcon 2000: 12 seats / 12,000 lb useful load.
Useful load = max gross weight minus empty weight; it determines how much fuel plus payload you can carry.
How does maintenance compare — TBO and overhaul cost?
Challenger 300: 5,000-hour TBO, overhaul ~$700,000.
Falcon 2000: 5,000-hour TBO, overhaul ~$800,000.
Reaching the time-between-overhaul (TBO) triggers a mandatory engine/airframe rebuild that affects resale value.
Disclaimer: All prices and cost estimates are from third-party sources for informational purposes only. Always obtain professional appraisal and inspection before purchase.
Prices updated daily · Data: FAA Registry, NTSB · About our data