Beechcraft Baron 58 vs Piper Aerostar

The Piper Aerostar (fast pressurised twin) and Beechcraft Baron 58 (unpressurised high-performance twin) are different-mission piston twins — the Aerostar is faster and pressurised; the Baron is the better-supported, higher-quality benchmark.

Live Market Snapshot

Current asking-price market, aggregated across multiple marketplaces · refreshed daily

Beechcraft Baron 58
For sale now
121
Median asking
$449,000
Range
$189,635–$1,319,400
Listed on 2+ marketplaces
40
Source marketplaces
11
Model years available
1970–2024
Piper Aerostar
For sale now
11
Median asking
$331,738
Range
$160,200–$479,938
Listed on 2+ marketplaces
7
Source marketplaces
4
Model years available
1976–1984

Live data from AeroGurus, aggregated daily across the used-aircraft market. Figures are current asking prices, not appraisals — confirm with a pre-buy inspection.

Safety Record

Absolute counts scale with fleet size — the most-produced types log more events without being less safe. Compare the % fatal.

NTSB (1982–now)Beechcraft Baron 58Piper Aerostar
All events40
Serious2
Fatal15
Fatalities38
% Fatal38%

Full Specs Comparison

Swipe to see all specs
Spec / Model Beechcraft Baron 58 Piper Aerostar
Beechcraft Baron 58
View 122 listings →
Median $449,000
Piper Aerostar
View 11 listings →
Median $331,738
Price Range $189,635 – $1,319,400 $160,200 – $479,938
Category Multi Engine Piston Multi Engine Piston
Model Specifications
Seats 6 6
Cruise Speed 190 kts (352 km/h) 220 kts (407 km/h)
Range 1,225 nm (2,269 km) 1,086 nm (2,011 km)
Service Ceiling 20,688 ft (6,306 m)
Max Gross Weight 5,500 lbs (2,495 kg) 6,000 lbs (2,722 kg)
Useful Load 1,846 lbs (837 kg)
Fuel Capacity 166.0 gal (628 L)
Fuel Burn 28.0 GPH (106 L/h)
TBO 1,700 hrs
Overhaul Cost $40,000
Annual Fixed $28,000
Hourly Variable $310
Engines 2 x Piston

Cost of Ownership

Estimate

Beechcraft Baron 58

Fuel$154/hr
Variable$310/hr
Annual Fixed$28,000/yr
Total (200 hrs/yr) $90,000/yr

Piper Aerostar

Which Should You Buy: Beechcraft Baron 58 or Piper Aerostar?

Bottom line: Choose the Baron 58 for build quality, support and resale in an unpressurised twin. Choose the Aerostar for the highest piston-twin cruise speed and pressurisation, accepting demanding systems and a smaller, specialist support base.

Pick the Baron 58 if…

  • Longer range — 1225 nm vs 1086 nm.
  • More inventory — 122 listings vs 11.

Pick the Aerostar if…

  • Budget matters — from $160,200 vs $189,635, you save ~$29,435.
  • Faster cruise — 220 kts vs 190 kts.

Auto-generated from current market data and published specs. Confirm with a pre-buy inspection and professional appraisal.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Beechcraft Baron 58 or Piper Aerostar?
It depends on your mission and budget. The Baron 58 cruises at 190 kts with 1,225 nm range. The Aerostar cruises at 220 kts with 1,086 nm range. Review the specs table above to find which fits your flying profile.
How do prices compare?
Beechcraft Baron 58: from $575,000. Piper Aerostar: from $159,000. Prices vary by year, hours, avionics, and condition. Always get a pre-buy inspection.
What's the difference between Beechcraft Baron 58 and Piper Aerostar?
Cruise: 190 vs 220 kts. Range: 1225 vs 1086 nm.
Which is cheaper to operate per hour?
Baron 58: about $310/hr variable cost. Variable cost includes fuel, reserves and overhaul accruals. Annual fixed costs (hangar, insurance, annual inspection) add to the total.
Which has more seats and useful load?
Baron 58: 6 seats / 1,846 lb useful load. Aerostar: 6 seats. Useful load = max gross weight minus empty weight; it determines how much fuel plus payload you can carry.
How does maintenance compare — TBO and overhaul cost?
Baron 58: 1,700-hour TBO, overhaul ~$40,000. Reaching the time-between-overhaul (TBO) triggers a mandatory engine/airframe rebuild that affects resale value.
Disclaimer: All prices and cost estimates are from third-party sources for informational purposes only. Always obtain professional appraisal and inspection before purchase.
Prices updated daily · Data: FAA Registry, NTSB · About our data