Agusta AW169 vs Bell 212
Live Market Snapshot
Current asking-price market, aggregated across multiple marketplaces · re-checked on a rolling daily cycle
Agusta AW169
- For sale now
- 7
- Model years available
- 2016–2026
Bell 212
- For sale now
- 10
- Model years available
- 1976–1996
Live data from AeroGurus, aggregated daily across the used-aircraft market. Figures are current asking prices, not appraisals — confirm with a pre-buy inspection.
Safety Record
Absolute counts scale with fleet size — the most-produced types log more events without being less safe. Compare the % fatal.
| NTSB (1982–now) | Agusta AW169 | Bell 212 |
|---|---|---|
| All events | — | 54 |
| Serious | — | 10 |
| Fatal | — | 17 |
| Fatalities | — | 45 |
| % Fatal | — | 31% |
Full Specs Comparison
Swipe to see all specs
| Spec / Model | Agusta AW169 | Bell 212 |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Price Range | $9,440,000 – $13,760,000 | $1,870,000 – $3,585,000 |
| Category | Twin Turbine Helicopter | Twin Turbine Helicopter |
| Model Specifications | ||
| Seats | 10 | 15 |
| Horsepower | 1,100 HP | 900 HP |
| Cruise Speed | 160 kts (296 km/h) | 115 kts (213 km/h) |
| Range | 440 nm (815 km) | 240 nm (444 km) |
| Service Ceiling | 20,000 ft (6,096 m) | 17,000 ft (5,182 m) |
| Max Gross Weight | 10,141 lbs (4,600 kg) | — |
| Useful Load | 3,500 lbs (1,588 kg) | 5,000 lbs (2,268 kg) |
| Fuel Burn | 60.0 GPH (227 L/h) | 80.0 GPH (303 L/h) |
| TBO | 3,500 hrs | 3,500 hrs |
| Overhaul Cost | $450,000 | $450,000 |
| Annual Fixed | $200,000 | $180,000 |
| Hourly Variable | $800 | $900 |
| Engines | 2 x Turboshaft | 2 x Turboshaft |
Cost of Ownership
EstimateAgusta AW169
Fuel$330/hr
Variable$800/hr
Annual Fixed$200,000/yr
Total (200 hrs/yr)
$360,000/yr
Bell 212
Fuel$440/hr
Variable$900/hr
Annual Fixed$180,000/yr
Total (200 hrs/yr)
$360,000/yr
Which Should You Buy: Agusta AW169 or Bell 212?
Pick the AW169 if…
- Lower operating cost — ~$800/hr vs $900/hr.
- Faster cruise — 160 kts vs 115 kts.
- Longer range — 440 nm vs 240 nm.
- Newer design — production from 2015 vs 1968.
Pick the 212 if…
- Budget matters — from $1,870,000 vs $9,440,000, you save ~$7,570,000.
- More seats — 15 vs 10.
- More inventory — 11 listings vs 6.
Auto-generated from current market data and published specs. Confirm with a pre-buy inspection and professional appraisal.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Agusta AW169 or Bell 212?
It depends on your mission and budget.
The AW169 cruises at 160 kts with 440 nm range.
The 212 cruises at 115 kts with 240 nm range.
Review the specs table above to find which fits your flying profile.
How do prices compare?
Agusta AW169: from $9,200,000.
Prices vary by year, hours, avionics, and condition. Always get a pre-buy inspection.
What's the difference between Agusta AW169 and Bell 212?
212 engine: Pratt & Whitney Canada PT6T-3;PT6T-3B (900 hp).
Seats: 10 vs 15.
Cruise: 160 vs 115 kts.
Range: 440 vs 240 nm.
Which is cheaper to operate per hour?
AW169: about $800/hr variable cost.
212: about $900/hr variable cost.
Variable cost includes fuel, reserves and overhaul accruals. Annual fixed costs (hangar, insurance, annual inspection) add to the total.
Which has more seats and useful load?
AW169: 10 seats / 3,500 lb useful load.
212: 15 seats / 5,000 lb useful load.
Useful load = max gross weight minus empty weight; it determines how much fuel plus payload you can carry.
How does maintenance compare — TBO and overhaul cost?
AW169: 3,500-hour TBO, overhaul ~$450,000.
212: 3,500-hour TBO, overhaul ~$450,000.
Reaching the time-between-overhaul (TBO) triggers a mandatory engine/airframe rebuild that affects resale value.
Disclaimer: All prices and cost estimates are from third-party sources for informational purposes only. Always obtain professional appraisal and inspection before purchase.
Prices re-checked on a rolling cycle — most within a few days · Data: FAA Registry, NTSB · About our data